Part 9 · Myth 45

Traditional remedies can treat structural spine problems

Partial Truth
From the Clinic

He'd had hijama three times for his sciatica, on the advice of a trusted practitioner in the community. His leg pain had lessened briefly after the first session — and he was convinced it was working. When he came to me, the herniated disc was still there and the nerve was still compressed. He didn't need his hope taken away. He needed honest information about what hijama can and cannot do.

What Patients Say

My family has used hijama (wet cupping) and traditional herbal remedies for generations. These treat spine problems at their root. Western medicine just treats symptoms.

Where Did This Come From?

Traditional healing practices — including hijama (wet cupping therapy), herbal medicine, and wasm (cauterisation therapy) — have deep roots in many cultures, including across the Arab world, South Asia, and Africa. They are embedded in religious and cultural tradition, recommended by trusted community figures, and experienced by many as genuinely helpful.

I want to approach this honestly and respectfully. Some traditional practices have real physiological mechanisms. Others offer genuine benefit through non-specific effects — reduced anxiety, therapeutic attention, relaxation — that are real even if the proposed mechanism isn't. And some are genuinely unhelpful or harmful for specific conditions.

The question isn't "are these practices worthless?" — it's "what can they actually do for structural spine problems specifically, and what can't they do?"

What the Science Actually Says

Hijama (wet cupping): Small studies suggest hijama may provide short-term pain relief for non-specific back pain — similar to other manual therapies. Proposed mechanisms include local tissue effects, improved circulation, and counter-irritation pain-gating. For non-specific back pain as a symptom, these modest benefits may be real. However: hijama cannot reposition a herniated disc, decompress a nerve root, treat vertebral fracture, or address spinal instability.

If your spine pain is from a structural problem requiring intervention, hijama addresses the symptom, not the cause. Herbal remedies: Some plant compounds have genuine anti-inflammatory activity — devil's claw (Harpagophytum), willow bark, and some Ayurvedic formulations have modest clinical evidence for back pain symptom relief. As symptom management, some herbal approaches have legitimate (if modest) evidence. Interactions with medications can occur, so disclosure to your doctor matters.

Wasm (cauterisation therapy): Application of heat marks to the skin near painful areas is a traditional practice in some communities. There is no clinical evidence base for this as a treatment for spinal pathology. Beyond the absence of evidence, there are real risks of burns, scarring, and infection. This is one area where I have significant concerns about patient safety.

The consistent limitation across traditional remedies: they work on muscle, fascia, and the nervous system's pain perception — they do not address structural spinal pathology. A disc herniation compressing a nerve, spinal stenosis, or vertebral instability requires structural management. No traditional remedy changes the anatomy.

The Verdict

Some traditional remedies have modest evidence for symptomatic relief of non-specific back pain. None can address structural spinal pathology — disc herniation, nerve compression, fracture, instability. When structural problems are present, traditional remedies address symptoms at best.

Take-Home MessageSeeking healing is natural and deeply human. If hijama or traditional herbal treatment gives you comfort and helps you manage your pain, I'm not here to take that away. What I'd ask is: make sure you also know what's structurally happening in your spine, and whether anything structural needs to be addressed. The two approaches can coexist — but traditional remedies should complement evidence-based treatment, not replace it when structural intervention is needed.

What To Do Instead

Yellow Flags — Worth Monitoring

  • Delay of evidence-based treatment while pursuing only traditional remedies — if symptoms are worsening (especially neurological symptoms), this warrants medical reassessment
  • Traditional remedies applied to a post-surgical site without disclosure to your surgeon — infection risk and wound healing implications

Red Flags — Get Checked Immediately

  • Wasm (cauterisation) application resulting in wound breakdown, infection, or non-healing — this requires prompt medical attention
  • Any neurological worsening (increasing leg weakness, bladder changes) during a period of exclusive traditional treatment — do not delay medical assessment
Reference Note
  • Cao H et al., "An updated systematic review of the evidence for wet cupping therapy (hijama) for musculoskeletal pain," PLoS ONE, 2012;7(9):e43766. Witt C et al., "Wet cupping on patients with chronic neck pain — a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Pain, 2016;17(1):11-20. Oltean H et al., "Herbal medicine for low-back pain," Cochrane Database, 2014.

← Back to all myths