Part 1 · Myth 3

Pain means damage

Busted
From the Clinic

Nadia scored her pain ten out of ten. Her MRI was largely normal for her age — a small bulge, nothing compressing a nerve. She was convinced something was being missed. The pain was absolutely real. The structural damage, largely, was not.

What Patients Say

Every time my back hurts, something must have gone wrong. My body is telling me there's damage — I should stop and rest until it stops.

Where Did This Come From?

Pain is supposed to mean damage. That's what we've been taught since childhood. You touch a hot stove, your hand hurts, there's a burn. The pain warned you and you pulled away. It makes complete biological sense — pain as a protective alarm system.

The problem is that the alarm system isn't perfectly calibrated. Sometimes it fires when there's no actual tissue damage. Sometimes it keeps firing long after the tissue has healed. And in the spine specifically — where pain is often the result of complex interactions between nerves, muscles, and the central nervous system — the relationship between "pain" and "damage" breaks down almost completely for many patients.

This isn't new science. We've known about this for decades. But it's a deeply counterintuitive idea, and clinicians don't always have the time to explain it properly, so people go home with half the picture.

What the Science Actually Says

Pain is produced by the brain as a protective response to perceived threat — not necessarily to actual tissue damage. This is the central insight of modern pain neuroscience. The brain takes in information from many sources (including but not limited to the tissues) and produces pain as an output when it judges there is sufficient reason to protect a body part.

Brain imaging studies show structural changes — including reduced grey matter density in pain-processing regions like the prefrontal cortex and thalamus — in people with chronic back pain. The "volume" of the pain system is turned up, and the brain itself is altered by this. This means people with chronic pain can experience significant pain from minor stimuli, or from no obvious stimulus at all. This is not psychological weakness. It's a real neurological phenomenon. On the flip side: significant tissue damage can exist with no pain at all.

Imaging studies consistently show people walking around with large disc herniations, significant degenerative changes, and even spinal stenosis — with no symptoms whatsoever. If pain always meant damage, these people would be in agony. They're not.

The Verdict

Pain does not reliably indicate damage. The relationship is real but complicated — sometimes pain signals damage, sometimes it doesn't. Context matters enormously.

Take-Home MessageYour pain is real — I want to be very clear about that. I'm not saying it's in your head. I'm saying that pain and damage are different things, and understanding that difference is actually liberating. It means pain doesn't always mean you're making things worse. It means you can, with the right guidance, move through some of that pain safely.

What To Do Instead

Yellow Flags — Worth Monitoring

  • Pain that has been constant for more than 3 months without a clear structural explanation — likely involves central sensitisation
  • Catastrophising — believing the worst about your pain — is a strong predictor of chronic pain disability and is treatable
  • Pain that spreads to unexpected areas (e.g., widespread body pain from a back problem) may indicate a sensitised nervous system

Red Flags — Get Checked Immediately

  • New severe pain following a specific event or trauma — do get this assessed, not assumed to be "just" central sensitisation
  • Pain accompanied by unexplained weight loss, night sweats, or fever — rule out systemic causes
  • Pain unresponsive to any position (can't get comfortable at all) — unusual pattern worth investigating
Reference Note
  • Moseley GL & Butler DS, "Explain Pain Supercharged," 2017. Apkarian AV et al., "Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic grey matter density," Journal of Neuroscience, 2004.

← Back to all myths